Re:The new architecture wars
by crabmusket on Thursday January 25, 2024 @07:38PM
(#39137504)
I thought that Alexander's "A City is not a Tree" had a statement about how grids are not necessarily a problem, and organically-shaped streets/towns are not necessarily a solution, but skimming it again I can't find it. Maybe it was in an essay responding to Alexander.
But grids themselves aren't necessarily bad. One can imagine a street grid as a trellis, on top of which life is able to grow in abundance. Alexander and Jacobs both didn't seem to have a problem with grids and right angles, only with poor uses of such.
For example, Jacobs talks about long blocks which prevent cross-mingling between parallel streets. She also describes how staggering streets with dog-legs and other obstructions can improve neighbourhoods by slowing traffic.
But you can humanize the grid a little:
https://tilings.math.uni-bielefeld.de/substitution/pentomino...
https://tilings.math.uni-bielefeld.de/substitution/domino/
>I also consider the harmonization of automobile and pedestrian traffic to be an open problem. Maximalists on both sides just talk past each other.
In its early days, StrongTowns made a big deal out of arguing that parking should always be put behind commercial buildings instead of in front of them, so the storefront reaches the sidewalk. They've spent less time talking about this now because it attracts vitriol from the people who want to get rid of parking altogether. Unfortunately, it seems like the loud people have found the urbanism discourse.