News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Revenue could be fatal: 3 reasons your startup should con... by drusenko on Monday April 30, 2012 @09:22PM (#3912506)
@zmanji: Absolutely. What evidence do you have to the contrary?

Here's evidence I have: Steve Anderson, one of Instagram's earliest investors and a board member, is also on our board. Just because they're not trying to make money on year 1 doesn't mean they weren't ever planning on making money.

Re:Revenue could be fatal: 3 reasons your startup should con... by zmanji on Monday April 30, 2012 @10:01PM (#3912625)
What evidence do you have to support your claim? As far as I can tell Instagram was a cool idea/product that got lots of users. I am unable to see a moneymaking opportunity from any angle from the current iteration of the product.

In addition, if they wanted to build a large independent business why would the sell out so early?

Re:Revenue could be fatal: 3 reasons your startup should con... by drusenko on Monday April 30, 2012 @09:59PM (#3912620)
@ktizo: I'm not name dropping, I'm presenting evidence that they were not "built to flip".

What evidence do you have to the contrary?

Re:Revenue could be fatal: 3 reasons your startup should con... by ktizo on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @11:28AM (#3914791)
You presented no evidence. You just mentioned that you have a business relationship with someone who put money in, without saying anything else. That, in and of itself, is evidence of nothing.

Also, I never alleged that Instagram specifically was built to flip (although I can see little to suggest that it wasn't, although that is not the same thing), I merely pointed out that phenomena such as Instagram encourages a lot of people to enter the market with that as their motive, often enough to drown out other businesses. And that kind of behaviour was a major factor in the death of the last web boom.

Re:Revenue could be fatal: 3 reasons your startup should con... by ktizo on Monday April 30, 2012 @09:32PM (#3912550)
Namedropping is no evidence whatsoever.

Furthermore, the namedropping of someone you share a corporate interest with is generally an admission of probable bias and using it as an argument in favour of your position isn't particularly convincing.