Re:Ring steps back from sharing video with police – mostly
by r0salesr on Thursday January 25, 2024 @10:32PM
(#39138614)
"turns out people do want a surveillance state"
I don't think that follows. How is wanting a bit of personal security the same as wanting a "surveilance state"?
Re:Ring steps back from sharing video with police – mostly
by kkarakk on Sunday January 28, 2024 @04:21PM
(#39169939)
because it doesn't stop at personal security - they participate in the forums set up by ring and share videos of "problematic activity".
that is a fundamental part of owning a ring camera - if you just cared about personal security you would buy a gun instead or live in a gated community. a camera isn't gonna do anything for you.
turns out people do want a surveillance state, they were just uncomfortable putting cameras on the roofs