Re:Why is machine learning 'hard'? (2016)
by jurgenaut23 on Wednesday January 24, 2024 @04:53AM
(#39115539)
Yes, bootcamps are really a great way to score high on the Dunning-Kruger score, but not so much on any other metric of value. You need lots of sweat and tears to become a capable and competent ML engineer, especially to tell apart intrinsic limitations (i.e., no signal in your data) vs extrinsic issues (e.g., a bug anywhere between ETL and prediction, or a methodological mistake).
Re:Why is machine learning 'hard'? (2016)
by kick_in_the_dor on Wednesday January 24, 2024 @09:40AM
(#39117839)
> and knows how computers work down to NAND gates.
I lol'd
To use a parallel from software if you just know a programming language, how to call libraries and APIs you can't compare to a guy with a solid CS background who also understands algorithms, data structures, complexity, math and knows how computers work down to NAND gates.
Because I have studied some ML fundamentals during my batchelor and master degrees I know I am not competent in ML and AI. But I know how to become competent if I need or want to. Most people do believe finishing a bootcamp and calling some frameworks in Python makes them competent.