News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Proposed Oklahoma skyscraper gets redesign to become USA'... by sib on Tuesday January 23, 2024 @11:21AM (#39105426)
>> It's well-understood that Europe doesn't build significant buildings anymore, and there's confusion about why a US city would want to build something large and noteworthy.

That seems a little unfair. For example, Philharmonie de Paris, France; Elbphilharmonie, Hamburg; The Shard, London; MAAT Museum, Lisbon.

Re:Proposed Oklahoma skyscraper gets redesign to become USA'... by justrealist on Tuesday January 23, 2024 @11:32AM (#39105608)
The Shard is the 47th largest building in the world. It's only notable in the absence of any other significant buildings in a nominally world-class city.
Re:Proposed Oklahoma skyscraper gets redesign to become USA'... by hagurganus on Tuesday January 23, 2024 @11:55AM (#39105982)
While I love supertall buildings, I don’t think height or size necessarily equates with notoriety, especially in a place like London.
Re:Proposed Oklahoma skyscraper gets redesign to become USA'... by wharvle on Tuesday January 23, 2024 @12:46PM (#39106808)
Paris seems to do pretty OK on all of density, vibrancy, and aesthetics, while segregating all their somewhat-tall buildings to La Defense. I'm skeptical that moving all those into the city proper, let alone aiming for top-X-buildings slots, would improve the city in any way.
Re:Proposed Oklahoma skyscraper gets redesign to become USA'... by sib on Tuesday January 23, 2024 @03:52PM (#39109626)
If the comment meant "tall" vs "significant," then granted. I think that, as a term of architectural art, "significant" means more than tall...