Re:Scientists report fundamental asymmetry between heating a...
by epgui on Monday January 22, 2024 @10:00PM
(#39099066)
It’s code for: we are really interested in continuing to research this and we believe it’s important (for reasons that nobody will really understand apart from the other 5-6 world experts), so we are making this statement as much of a marketing stretch as possible without it being technically dishonest.
Getting research funding is just a brutally competitive game.
Re:Scientists report fundamental asymmetry between heating a...
by koolba on Monday January 22, 2024 @09:50PM
(#39098987)
It’s code for: We’re not sure what it can do, but throw some more money at us and we’ll eventually tell you!
Re:Scientists report fundamental asymmetry between heating a...
by jacquesm on Monday January 22, 2024 @10:52PM
(#39099428)
In lots of published papers there is some kind of call-out for the requirement of future research.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=more...
A sentence like that or a variation thereof is part of the 'dance' around funding.
Re:Scientists report fundamental asymmetry between heating a...
by lupire on Monday January 22, 2024 @09:47PM
(#39098973)
Swarm of killer robots.
Re:Scientists report fundamental asymmetry between heating a...
by Jweb_Guru on Tuesday January 23, 2024 @03:59AM
(#39101066)
It's code for "this is important and useful to the world, but probably won't lead to any immediately practical applications from the perspective of the funders (economically, militarily, etc.). But we have to say it might or we won't get funded."
Is it actually code for "very dangerous military applications, DARPA please pay attention to me!"