Re:Google and AT&T invest in Starlink rival for satellite-to...
by xedrac on Monday January 22, 2024 @09:32PM
(#39098846)
Would that compel them to launch their competitors' products into space? Seems like they could just say "build your own rockets".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google and AT&T invest in Starlink rival for satellite-to...
by perihelions on Monday January 22, 2024 @10:38PM
(#39099334)
Yes—same way railroads were forced to carry their competitors' freight, at fair rates. (That when US railroad monopolies were acquiring the companies making use of their railways, so that they could kill off those company's competitors and leverage their rail monopolies into new monopolies, in different fields. These are old tricks).
Re:Google and AT&T invest in Starlink rival for satellite-to...
by xedrac on Tuesday January 23, 2024 @09:52AM
(#39104065)
Except railways occupy land that may physically exclude competitors from being able to build their own (mountain passes etc...). No such limitation exists for launching a rocket.
Re:Google and AT&T invest in Starlink rival for satellite-to...
by perihelions on Tuesday January 23, 2024 @11:38AM
(#39105709)
Antitrust isn't solely limited to natural monopolies. (Also most of the time, what you describe wasn't quite the case—there's many places were there's two, useless railways running parallel for each other for stretch, not for any technically useful reason—just an economic cooperation failure. You can call the monopolist's bluff and build a redundant (n+1)th rail line or an (n+1)th orbital launch company—it's just devastatingly expensive).