News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on encryption is not gravy. Parent comment

Re: encryption is not gravy by joejohnson on Monday April 30, 2012 @11:08AM (#3909553)
I would too. I would pay maybe $100+ a year for this, even for only 4GB or whatever I currently have on Dropbox. But maybe this still wouldn't be profitable to develop if only a small group of paranoid users would buy it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: encryption is not gravy by Retric on Monday April 30, 2012 @11:41AM (#3909674)
10$ a month is not a lot of money. But, why not just use Dropbox on locally encrypted files?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: encryption is not gravy by joejohnson on Monday April 30, 2012 @11:49AM (#3909716)
Because then the web interface is worthless and you have to decrypt the files on every machine you sync with Dropbox
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: encryption is not gravy by hemancuso on Monday April 30, 2012 @12:05PM (#3909793)
Check SpiderOak - sounds like exactly what you want. https://spideroak.com/
[ Parent | on HN ]