My point is you don't necessarily need chemical inducement to start or sustain the idea. Centuries of religious people believed in transcendent consciousness at times in history where they demonstrably had no access to drugs. You don't need to partake to be moved by John Lennon's all you need is love either; a lot of the people listening did not. And part of our cultural norms have these ideas baked in, with or without drugs.
It is totally believable that a true religious zealot would be able to achieve much, much more with decades of practice.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/baba-ram-da...
Probably BS, but matches with what you say.
And in the three main monotheist religions formation stories there is a good amount of time spent/lost in the desert.
A shaman brewing a mystical drink that gives you visions of supernatural forces is pretty convincing evidence of a god(s) to your any 2000 B.C. person. How else could you explain such a trip while having no concept of chemicals much less neurochemistry.