Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network?
by jandrese on Monday January 22, 2024 @10:05AM
(#39090199)
From what I can tell Bluesky doesn't have an algorithm. It just seems to show you the posts/reposts from the people you follow in chronological order.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network?
by enragedcacti on Monday January 22, 2024 @10:48AM
(#39090706)
A big selling point of Bluesky is algorithmic choice. There are three default feeds, one is "following" which is exactly what you said. If you swipe to the right you get "Discover" which is a lot like the "For You" Twitter feed. Finally there is "Popular With Friends" which is what it says on the tin.
If you don't like those, anyone can develop a feed algorithm and anyone can subscribe to it, so you can have topic based feeds like "Science" or you can have feeds that just change the way the feed behaves like "OnlyPosts", which is the following feed but with no reposts or replies.
Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network?
by Solvency on Monday January 22, 2024 @10:20AM
(#39090361)
so... what exactly IS Bluesky good at then?
Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network?
by jandrese on Monday January 22, 2024 @10:24AM
(#39090412)
It's good at showing you the posts from the people you follow. The quality of your feed is entirely up to you.
Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network?
by tekla on Monday January 22, 2024 @10:40AM
(#39090608)
That's exactly what Twitter does. Why is this a differentiating feature?
Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network?
by jandrese on Monday January 22, 2024 @11:15AM
(#39091171)
Fewer Nazis in your replies is the big one.
Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network?
by mal-2 on Monday January 22, 2024 @12:36PM
(#39092460)
Has this changed recently? When I was on Twitter a few years ago I often missed posts from my friends because the algorithm didn't show them to me. Same when I posted, often my friends didn't see it.