News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network?. Parent comment

Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network? by eli on Monday January 22, 2024 @09:21AM (#39089784)
It's actually even less successful if that's the metric. The people who care about how it works are mostly on Masto. BlueSky has a dedicated user base, but it's not among protocol nerds.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network? by aleph_minus_one on Monday January 22, 2024 @09:47AM (#39090023)
> It's actually even less successful if that's the metric.

BlueSky was founded October 2021, while Mastadon exists since 2016. The latter thus had lot more time to get traction. :-)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why isn't Bluesky a peer-to-peer network? by packetlost on Monday January 22, 2024 @09:28AM (#39089851)
idk, I find the protocol itself to be the most interesting aspect of BlueSky, it seems to be better designed than ActivityPub at this point.
[ Parent | on HN ]