News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Have the Boomers Pinched Their Children's Futures? [video] by rayiner on Monday January 22, 2024 @08:22AM (#39089231)
> That used to be achievable for most people. It's not now.

That’s not really true. Home ownership rates for, example, are higher today than in 1950. And houses are twice as big as they were back then.

Re:Have the Boomers Pinched Their Children's Futures? [video] by ttyprintk on Monday January 22, 2024 @09:31AM (#39089890)
The whole point of this post is that statistics in aggregate obscure the effects between generations.

The first-time homebuyer is now the smallest proportion ever among homebuyers, and doing so at the oldest age recorded.

Re:Have the Boomers Pinched Their Children's Futures? [video] by rayiner on Monday January 22, 2024 @09:51AM (#39090058)
It’s not really that different breaking it down by generation: https://www.redfin.com/news/gen-z-millennial-homeownership-r.... Millennials have somewhat lower home ownership rates than boomers did at the same age, but I suspect most of the difference can be explained by:

1) millennials starting their lives four years later due to college becoming much more common;

2) millennials choosing to live in urban areas rather than cheaper suburbs, as compared to boomers.

Re:Have the Boomers Pinched Their Children's Futures? [video] by ttyprintk on Monday January 22, 2024 @10:13AM (#39090277)
That’s a great article. I suspect the difference in statistics is that RedFin only represents mortgages, not the 30% of sales in cash.

I’m not sure it supports point 2), though. The comparison is between millennial and Gen Z.