Re:Jeff Atwood's security blunder regarding email
by ravivyas on Monday April 30, 2012 @12:04AM
(#3907977)
The DigiNotar case was an anomaly where the certificate provider was compromised. This is a rare case.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Jeff Atwood's security blunder regarding email
by sneak on Monday April 30, 2012 @12:57AM
(#3908087)
It's nowhere near as rare as you think. There are sub-CA certs issued to private companies all the time, allowing them to MITM any default browser config.
The PKI is now totally broken.
Re:Jeff Atwood's security blunder regarding email
by unimpressive on Monday April 30, 2012 @12:15AM
(#3908005)
http://www.infoworld.com/t/authentication/weaknesses-in-ssl-...
Seems to happen often enough.
(Then again, 2011 seems to have been something of an unlucky year for security professionals. Just ask RSA.)