Re:Why do we have right-on-red, and is it time to get rid of...
by dventimi on Sunday January 21, 2024 @01:15AM
(#39076076)
If you were told that getting rid of it would lower pedestrian fatalities, and you believed that, would YOU want to take it away?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why do we have right-on-red, and is it time to get rid of...
by PakG1 on Sunday January 21, 2024 @01:19AM
(#39076106)
Sure, except Americans may also have a weird obsession with driving that makes them oblivious to pedestrians, whereas many other nations may be more aware of pedestrians and thus have fewer fatalities per capita. I have no data to back up such a statement. Just anecdotal experiences.
Re:Why do we have right-on-red, and is it time to get rid of...
by sshine on Sunday January 21, 2024 @03:49AM
(#39076773)
...pe-de-strians?
What's that? Walking people???
Have they lost their car?
You have to know what it is to see it. :-D
Re:Why do we have right-on-red, and is it time to get rid of...
by detourdog on Sunday January 21, 2024 @01:29AM
(#39076162)
I found the statistics in the article were not presented in a coherent manner. I couldn’t tell if right on red had a greater impact or not.
Re:Why do we have right-on-red, and is it time to get rid of...
by cykros on Sunday January 21, 2024 @06:20AM
(#39077485)
If it's really pedestrian fatalities we're concerned about, we should be implementing red right-facing arrows, which are on when the walk light is on.
Right on red, unless that arrow is on. Perhaps a blinking yellow arrow for when it isn't, just to avoid the ambiguity.
Or, when you're walking into the road, maybe make sure that drivers nearby see you. I played Ingress and Pokemon Go for years, in the city, at night, for years. Perhaps it's that I knew it put me at heightened risk so I paid more attention, but I really have a hard time understanding why people think that drivers are the only ones who need to pay attention when they're in the street.