I've not made anything up. Your claim that I have is nonsense.
OpenAI changing their ToS for the military on a whim: https://archive.is/GILKl - for your enjoyment.
OpenAI ToS: "What You Cannot Do. You may not use our Services for any illegal, harmful, or abusive activity. For example, you may not:
* Use Output to develop models that compete with OpenAI."
If that was your point, I'm pretty sure everyone missed it. No one is training models as a form of caching their previous responses. They want to improve the quality of responses they haven't generated yet. That's not caching.
> I've not made anything up.
You said customers don't own the output; they do. I said you made most of it up, and you did. Including your apparent retconning of your original point.
So... You didn't read the article of which you're commenting in?
> You said customers don't own the output; they do. I said you made most of it up, and you did.
You don't own it. If I own something, I can do whatever I want with it. This is just like your iPhone. You don't actually own it, because you can only do with it what Apple allows you to do.
> Including your apparent retconning of your original point.
Wow, enjoy your day. Your misunderstanding is, apparently, my "retconning". Maybe read the original piece you're responding to within the thread.
> If I own something, I can do whatever I want with it
BRB digitizing my entire media collection and uploading it to the public internet.
> As between you and OpenAI, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, you (a) retain your ownership rights in Input and (b) own the Output. We hereby assign to you all our right, title, and interest, if any, in and to Output.
It follows that your claim about caching violating OAI's terms is nonsense.