Re:Norwegian youth win climate court case against the Norweg...
by ipaddr on Thursday January 18, 2024 @08:58PM
(#39050718)
You would be silly not to take a better algorithm. It doesn't matter if it came from sales, a student or a homemaker.
If you can't judge something on it's merits and must rely on other signals then you end up judging the envelope and not the message.
Re:Norwegian youth win climate court case against the Norweg...
by was_a_dev on Friday January 19, 2024 @05:54AM
(#39054004)
If it was a better algorithm - then of couse. You wouldn't be a very good software engineer (or scientist) if you couldn't recognise that.
This has veered off from my original point. In that saying "follow the science" is not a issue - there is nothing wrong with following the opinion of experts in their field.
Are these scientifically founded opinions. Not necessarily, hence why "following the science" is valid if you are following experts in their field.
If you're a software consultant, would you take on the opinions from a marketing client on the best algorithm to implement for their solution? Probably not.
If someone put in the effort and time to throughly research the topic and draw an opinion from that. Regardless of their title or their funding, then why would you discount it?