How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes

Re:How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes by JamesLeonis on Saturday April 28, 2012 @06:10PM (#3904278)

Income tax only accounts for some of the taxes a state can take in. Property and sales tax are also forms states use to collect income, and they happen to be regressive in most cases.

If you look at the CFED chart [2], those nine states [1] with no income tax make up the top 9 slots where the bottom 20% pay many times more in taxes than the top 1% (as a percentage of income), from 3.8 times (Tennessee) to a whopping 6.7 times (Washington).

[1] http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=130684,00.html

[2] http://scorecard.assetsandopportunity.org/2012/measure/tax-b...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes by yummyfajitas on Sunday April 29, 2012 @08:45AM (#3905861)

...states [1] with no income tax make up the top 9 slots where the bottom 20% pay many times more in taxes than the top 1%...

By itself, this statistic is meaningless. A state with a progressive tax system but lower rates of inequality will score poorly on this metric than a state with higher inequality but an identical tax system.

I.e., you might be showing Tennessee has a regressive tax system, or you might be showing Tennessee has low inequality. Without more details we cannot determine this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes by Drbble on Saturday April 28, 2012 @07:19PM (#3904466)

Note that welfare benefits can cancel out a lot of taxes and restore the progressive effect.

[ Parent | on HN ]