On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train Midjourney

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by cwkoss on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @12:24PM (#39030643)

> Probably mined from 3rd world country slaves (in the literal "owning people" sense).

Why do you think the device you're using to make this comment is better than a GPU?

Was your comment written by some new flamebait AI? You say so many arguments that fall apart under the slightest examination

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by johnnyanmac on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @02:36PM (#39032341)

I'm not. But I'm going to hold a company who's responsible for the production more accountable than a consumer who can't research the sourcing of every single part of their personal device.

>Was your comment written by some new flamebait AI

IIRC AI focuses on formal language and discourages slang. Either way:

>Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

[ Parent | on HN ]