On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train Midjourney

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by whamlastxmas on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @10:22AM (#39028924)

> The model isn't an "intelligence" because it's not making a choice about which data you train on and be "inspired by", as people here say.

This is a very poor definition of intelligence and is not convincing of deserving training data

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by romwell on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @12:39PM (#39030863)

So says you.

Models aren't capable of existing without humans in the loop making the choice of which data they get trained on.

Consequently, those humans and their choices need to be regulated.

[ Parent | on HN ]