News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train Midjourney. Parent comment

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by tekknik on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @09:42AM (#39028342)
> I see no reason for why a neural network's output should be protected by copyright. Only humans can produce copyrightable works, and a prompt is not a sufficient creative input.

Your brain is a neural network, just FYI.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by vkou on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @06:49PM (#39035339)
A privileged one, compared to one made of silicon, in the eyes of the law.
[ Parent | on HN ]