News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Norwegian: Bokmål vs. Nynorsk by goblin89 on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @05:41AM (#39026004)
If they were solely written languages then you wouldn’t be able to, for example, read the text aloud, right?

I don’t have any first-hand knowledge, but according to Wikipedia on Bokmål it looks like it can be spoken as well (Wikipedia uses a phrase “spoken Bokmål”), but without a universally agreed-upon and regulated pronunciation. Isn’t it similar to English in this sense?

Re:Norwegian: Bokmål vs. Nynorsk by Tor3 on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @06:18AM (#39026275)
Bokmål and Nynorsk are both systems designed as a common form of writing. None of them were ever meant to be a spoken language - they are "best effort" of trying to make a unified way of writing. That doesn't mean that it's not possible to "speak" them, as in e.g. reading aloud (though the intonation and pronunciation may still wary wildly depending on the speaker's actual dialect).
Re:Norwegian: Bokmål vs. Nynorsk by goblin89 on Thursday January 18, 2024 @12:05AM (#39038105)
That means I was wrong in my original understanding!
Re:Norwegian: Bokmål vs. Nynorsk by CogitoCogito on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @05:58AM (#39026108)
> If they were solely written languages then you wouldn’t be able to, for example, read the text aloud, right?

I believe /u/Tor3's point is that Norwegians would read and pronounce nynorsk and bokmål the same regardless of the differences in the writing.

> Isn’t it similar to English in this sense?

It is. I don't pronounce English words differently when they're written with e.g. British or American spellings.