Haha that's what I was thinking.

It's not that we need to eat comfortable not owning our games, it's that you need to be comfortable with us not owning your games.

"Ubishit" was a term 15+ years ago already...

And nothing's changed. Consumers are entirely incapable of collective action to punish repugnant companies.

> Consumers are entirely incapable of collective action to punish repugnant companies

Consumers do not have milions of dollars to spend on "lobby".

You don't really need to. Just don't buy their games.

Translated:

"now that the international law and order collapses in on itself, we realize we need that to extract value with our rentseeking behavior. Turns out instability kills us and we accelerated it directly and indirectly. We are happy to go passing our chest of worrn down IP to the public and to be used by future generations as a warning ironic example what happens, when you rely on taxes but are unwilling to pay them yourself. "

Ain't I entertaining you? Unity sepukku. It's been years since I bought anything from ubisoft.

Useless caste really wants to find out

It is better than Gamer says Ubisoft Exec need to get comfortable with "gamers not paying their game".