On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train Midjourney

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by tapoxi on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @03:50PM (#39018937)

If we're discussing the current situation, where ChatGPT is outputting entire articles of NYT copyrighted content, then it certainly matches say, Bittersweet Symphony containing a small sample of a Rolling Stones song resulting in the Stones getting credit for the entire work.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by ta8645 on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @04:01PM (#39019083)

There is a rather vibrant culture of _human_ remix artists who sample existing music and generate something completely new. It is still an open question of how long a sample they can use before it requires licensing:

https://www.ajschwartzlaw.com/can-i-use-that-part-2-remix-cu...

But all of this, doesn't have much to do with whether an AI should be allowed to consume public media -- even if we agree they need to do a better job about avoiding verbatim reconstruction when prompted.

Edit: I wasn't able to find the Lawrence Lessig talk I wanted to link, but here's a quite old one that makes some of the same points:

https://youtu.be/X8ULxxgjBuI

[ Parent | on HN ]