News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Supreme Court Snubs Apple-Epic Games Legal Battle by newprint on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @02:19PM (#39017673)
From what I understand, ruling is saying: Apple can't block developers from displaying notification that the app can be bought cheaper elsewhere.
Re:US Supreme Court Snubs Apple-Epic Games Legal Battle by threeseed on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @07:00PM (#39021022)
But it won't be cheaper elsewhere since developer still needs to pay the 30% commission.
Re:US Supreme Court Snubs Apple-Epic Games Legal Battle by ko27 on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @07:14PM (#39021173)
How would that work? From my previous comment, let's say you add this message (no links): "Buy with Apple Pay, or visit our website and pay 20% less". Nobody knows how many users decided to visit the website instead.
Re:US Supreme Court Snubs Apple-Epic Games Legal Battle by 542458 on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @07:23PM (#39021286)
It would work the same as many other revenue sharing agreements out there (including those for Epic’s own Unreal Engine). Yes, there’s no technical mechanism to keep you from screwing the other party (and small-scale fraud will likely go undetected), but there are contractual/legal mechanisms.
Re:US Supreme Court Snubs Apple-Epic Games Legal Battle by threeseed on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @08:00PM (#39021638)
Total Installs - App Store Installs = Third Party Installs

And they know total installs from the notary service.

Re:US Supreme Court Snubs Apple-Epic Games Legal Battle by simiones on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @07:43AM (#39026927)
That doesn't work for in-app purchases, which is almost certainly the majority of revenue.