On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train Midjourney

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by robertlagrant on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @01:34PM (#39016837)

It would be good to see how much it changes if you only include work that is public domain.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by notpachet on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @01:54PM (#39017214)

Any prompt response longer than 30 characters inevitably devolves into verbatim passages from The Iliad.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by robertlagrant on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @04:19AM (#39025345)

I could get on board with this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by realusername on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @02:24PM (#39017747)

If that includes a drastic revamp of copyright laws to increase the public domain, why not.

I don't see why Disney or Universal would be more legitimate than OpenAI to profit from stuff made from now dead authors 60 years ago. Both seems as legitimate.

[ Parent | on HN ]