Re:Panama Canal drought forces Maersk to start using land br...
by bluGill on Sunday January 14, 2024 @01:46PM
(#38993163)
The context here is bypassing the canal for a railroad across Mexico. While you have described the problem with the Jones act, the premises is we are loading/unloading in Mexico that changes a lot. Smaller ships can go to many different ports - large ones would probably still got to North Carolina, but we can sort in Mexico which means some (likely small) shipping company can run routes to smaller ports, they can take exports from those smaller ports and then sorting in Mexico can get it on/off the right ships. For US east coast to cargo that is crossing the pacific this makes sense (it doesn't make sense for cargo crossing the Atlantic though, so the Jones act is still a problem)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Panama Canal drought forces Maersk to start using land br...
by Scoundreller on Sunday January 14, 2024 @04:38PM
(#38994678)
This is effectively what happens with air cargo in Anchorage. It's a nice mid-point between asia and north america. They can receive aircraft cargo from many different sources in asia and then shuffle it between aircraft to ship it to different destinations in north america.
Iceland Airlines kinda does the same shuffle for transatlantic flights and self-loading freight ;)