News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GMail: designer arrogance and the cult of minimalism by eridius on Friday April 27, 2012 @02:53AM (#3897920)
A third option is they tested each individual change in isolation, and then grabbed all of the high-performing changes and lumped them together. Just because the individual changes may have been improvements within the context of the old UI doesn't mean they're still good once put together with all the other changes.

That said, I have trouble believing that changing the buttons from labels to icons could have possibly tested as an improvement. I'm with the OP; I have to mouse over every button and read the tooltip to find the Report Spam one.

Re:GMail: designer arrogance and the cult of minimalism by seldo on Friday April 27, 2012 @03:16AM (#3897982)
FYI, I found this article really helpful:

http://jasoncrawford.org/2012/04/how-to-cope-with-the-gmail-...

It shows how to: get rid of "importance" markers, add some contrast back to the colors, remove superfluous whitespace, and most importantly, change the impenetrable icons back to text.

Re:GMail: designer arrogance and the cult of minimalism by Drbble on Friday April 27, 2012 @11:29AM (#3899479)
Maybe Gmail 's spam detection is too good. It's the octagonal "stop sign" icon.