Well, Wikipedia, with all their governance rules (good and/or bad), is one of the top places to watch when there are conflicts that are plaguing social media. It has more transparency and I am curious why social researchers and [investigative] journalists are extemely slow as a low motion snail analyzing it.

BTW, the Iranian Cyber Army [1] really exists! Like other cyber armies around the world.

You can now look at many articles referring to the Israel-Hamas-[Hezbollah] war [2][3][4][5].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Cyber_Army

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_and_gender-based_violen...

[3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Violati...

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re%27im_music_festival_massacr...

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Allegations_of_genocide_i...