Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012)
by PaulDavisThe1st on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @07:40PM
(#38945775)
This is always going to be a very subjective assessment. I don't doubt that the comparison makes sense for you, but it's not the way my spouse or I see it.
Also, most movies I might go to a theater to see cost substantially more than $4 on amzn.
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012)
by shkkmo on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @07:51PM
(#38945873)
Paying monthly to Netflix vs. paying per use with Amazon isn't a subjective difference. If you are only watching 2 movies a month of average, then Amazon is objectively a better deal than Netflix as you not only pay less, but have more options. (Amazon movies are generally $4 or $6 to rent.)
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012)
by PaulDavisThe1st on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @08:11PM
(#38946075)
Given that we do both, the actual question is whether Netflix manages to offer us one exclusive offering per month that ticks the box. This particular January, it is setting itself quite nicely for the year :)
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012)
by boulos on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @10:36PM
(#38947216)
Movies yes, but often a single episode of a show is say $2. That means if you watch a season in a month, you're up to $16-20 pretty quickly with 8-10 episodes.
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012)
by FalconSensei on Friday January 12, 2024 @01:26PM
(#38971879)
This is why I legit jack sparrow shows.
You can rent movies on many services like google, itunes, youtube, etc... But for shows, you only have the option to buy each episode, which makes no sense.
Amazon will rent you most movies for <$4, so 4 movies per month is the number for Netflix to beat, not 1.