Re:Israeli group claims it’s using back channels to censor “...
by wolverine876 on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @05:50PM
(#38944583)
> I think a lot of people think it does, but social media has little affect on politicians.
The politicians want you to think that, but they are beholden to public opinion and follow the herd. There's a reason that powerful actors spend many resources on manipulating social media.
Re:Israeli group claims it’s using back channels to censor “...
by bhouston on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @06:46PM
(#38945282)
In my experience political donations make more of an impact on politicians than social media. AIPAC is incredibly effective and it is ramping up donations to keep politicians supportive of Israel in their seats: https://readsludge.com/2024/01/02/aipac-makes-record-donatio...
AIPAC is also going to try to take out most of the members of the progressive squad, unsure if they will be effective, but they are spending $100M to do so: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/11/squad-primary-ba...
Re:Israeli group claims it’s using back channels to censor “...
by wolverine876 on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @07:26PM
(#38945653)
AIPAC organizes, effectively, widespread public support. Cross AIPAC and you may lose many voters.
Donations are valuable because politicans need money to get votes. Again, it comes down to votes.
Just add mute words in Twitter for Israel, Palestine and a few variants and you can ignore what is going on really easily. I did this for Elon and Musk and it made the platform much more bearable for me.
> Without exaggeration, 99% of all suggested content I get on each of these three platforms is pro-palestinian.
Well, unfortunately social media doesn't stop wars, otherwise it would have stopped by now based on likes and retweets. I think a lot of people think it does, but social media has little affect on politicians.