News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed] by wlesieutre on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @05:08PM (#38932913)
They didn't say the SEC did it, they said the SEC was "responsible" for it.

Which may or may not be true, if they were using "password123" then sure that's negligent and they'd bear some of the responsibility, but it might not have been the SEC's fault at all.

Re:SEC has not approved Bitcoin ETFs [fixed] by diggan on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @09:39AM (#38939415)
> Which may or may not be true, if they were using "password123" then sure that's negligent and they'd bear some of the responsibility, but it might not have been the SEC's fault at all.

It seems like SEC didn't even have some basic protections in place for their Twitter account, like having 2nd-factor enabled. That feels kind of negligent already, even if they had a very secure password.