Re:Duolingo Cuts 10% of Contractors as It Uses More AI to Cr...
by karaterobot on Monday January 08, 2024 @05:35PM
(#38919288)
Studying Duolingo for 18 months should have primed them for success, but after just three weeks of an in-person class, it was evident that it had not. It's implied (or assumed) that the class was for 2nd year students or less, so Duolingo must be less effective than traditional instruction.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Duolingo Cuts 10% of Contractors as It Uses More AI to Cr...
by vr46 on Monday January 08, 2024 @06:33PM
(#38920054)
Class is ongoing and it's for complete and utter beginners, I'm in week 5 right now. Gave up on Duolingo maybe 18 months ago or more.
Re:Duolingo Cuts 10% of Contractors as It Uses More AI to Cr...
by attentive on Monday January 08, 2024 @05:50PM
(#38919491)
Duolingo saving a year of in-person classes sounds like a success to me.
Re:Duolingo Cuts 10% of Contractors as It Uses More AI to Cr...
by karaterobot on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @12:00AM
(#38922525)
It took much longer and did not work, and that's a success in your opinion?