Re:"95% of container ships are now going around the Southern...
by mmmBacon on Monday January 08, 2024 @03:19PM
(#38917533)
While the Houthi drone itself is inexpensive, the cost to the economy of a drone hitting shipping is substantially greater than the $3M cost of the US interceptor missile.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:"95% of container ships are now going around the Southern...
by egorfine on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @04:41AM
(#38924137)
Good.How about ten drones ($200k) and ten interceptors ($30m)? Is the cost of the economy still greater? Alright, let's up the numbers. Forty drones vs forty interceptors, $800k vs $120m. Do the numbers still work for the US? Like, would Yemen gladly pay $800k to kill an american vessel? I guess yes. Would it be economically effective to spend $120m on a protection of said vessel? Perhaps not.
So, at a certain number between one and forty drones the economy stops making sense.
This is what happens here in Ukraine as well: russian drones are cheap and readily available, while interceptors are expensive af and quite scarce.
Re:"95% of container ships are now going around the Southern...
by mmmBacon on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @04:33PM
(#39019453)
According to this:
https://www.freightwaves.com/news/22b-worth-of-cargo-is-now-...
the average value of goods per container ship is ~$350M per ship not including the value of the ship itself. However I think the impact to the economy from a missile hitting a ship far exceeds the value of the goods, the ship, and the cost of any missiles used to defend those goods.