News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The New York Times Launches a Strong Case Against Microso... by throwaway4aday on Monday January 08, 2024 @11:18AM (#38914205)
So you're just going to ignore the fact that we require humans to provide citations when they include someone else's writing or research in their own?
Re:The New York Times Launches a Strong Case Against Microso... by ryanklee on Monday January 08, 2024 @03:40PM (#38917773)
I didn't ignore it. But we do not require citations for every statement. Statements have value, citations notwithstanding.
Re:The New York Times Launches a Strong Case Against Microso... by throwaway4aday on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @10:03AM (#38926958)
I didn't say it should provide citations for every statement. We're talking about instances where the model reproduces text verbatim. If it is paraphrasing or creating new text then obviously it doesn't need to cite any more than a human would.
Re:The New York Times Launches a Strong Case Against Microso... by ryanklee on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @05:05PM (#38932884)
I don't understand what you're pushing back against, but I'm not standing there.