News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Phrase "No Evidence" Is a Red Flag for Bad Science Co... by staunton on Monday January 08, 2024 @09:04AM (#38912039)
> any information which increases the likelihood of a claim being true

This sounds like "Bayesian evidence". However, I don't think "scientific evidence" has a precise agreed-upon definition. I would take "there is scientific evidence" to mean "some scientists say they have significant evidence that they themselves obtained directly and that they have published or presented".

Re:The Phrase "No Evidence" Is a Red Flag for Bad Science Co... by Symmetry on Monday January 08, 2024 @10:00AM (#38912880)
And scientific evidence is also a very different bar depending on what sort of science you're doing. In medicine the gold standard is a double blind RCT but a geologist can't reasonably conduct RCTs with volcanic eruptions so they aren't required, but thankfully rocks are much simpler than biological systems. Or for psychologists p=.05 is enough for a study to be good evidence but particle physicists require much lower p values than that for something to be official scientific evidence.