Re:Defending against hypothetical moon life during Apollo 11
by andrewflnr on Sunday January 07, 2024 @06:21PM
(#38906284)
Does it? Do you think "pressing on" is the optimal course in both scenarios for the same reason?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Defending against hypothetical moon life during Apollo 11
by cubefox on Sunday January 07, 2024 @07:00PM
(#38906539)
In both cases a central safety effort seems nearly impossible. E.g. trying to enforce international AI risk cooperation via air strikes against data centers [1] can easily be avoided by defecting countries by building supercomputers underground.
With the moon bugs this wasn't a big problem, as they were so unlikely. But for AI the risk seems quite large to me.
[1] https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-no...
Re:Defending against hypothetical moon life during Apollo 11
by andrewflnr on Sunday January 07, 2024 @07:08PM
(#38906587)
Right, but the original comment is trying to draw comfort from the actual Apollo scenario where central enforcement very much happened, not from my modified scenario. I think we're on roughly the same page.