News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The New York Times Launches a Strong Case Against Microso... by a_wild_dandan on Sunday January 07, 2024 @03:31PM (#38904857)
Personally, those criteria seem irrelevant. If people were immortal and infinitely replicable, what they're allowed to read/learn/speak shouldn't change! Ditto for the machine counterfactual (limited AI reproduction + mortality). Maybe I'm just being unhelpfully sci-fi/abstract here.

If humans are contextually special here, a "passing the torch" argument seems unconvincing, to me.

There are no comments on this comment yet.