News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get it in the air. Parent comment

Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by jacquesm on Friday January 05, 2024 @06:34PM (#38886571)
This goes for self driving cars just the same.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by TaylorAlexander on Friday January 05, 2024 @06:46PM (#38886663)
Yeah it leads to real problems for fully driverless cars, as there is no longer a human to blame.

Also note that blaming the human has been Tesla's strategy for avoiding responsibility on their software drive system failures.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by dev1n on Friday January 05, 2024 @08:19PM (#38887306)
Most car - pedestrian crashes in the USA never end up with the driver at fault. Not sure this will change when cars are autonomous.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by TaylorAlexander on Friday January 05, 2024 @08:48PM (#38887517)
Well I am talking about all crashes, not just car-pedestrian crashes. For example Teslas crash in to other cars and then the company blames the human driver.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by aeturnum on Friday January 05, 2024 @06:36PM (#38886583)
An example used in the paper are the human drivers of Uber self-driving cars - one of which killed a pedestrian in Arizona.
[ Parent | on HN ]