News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Room-Temperature Superconductor Replicated. Parent comment

Re:Room-Temperature Superconductor Replicated by Brian_K_White on Thursday January 04, 2024 @03:01PM (#38871508)
We don't need a theory suggesting it's possible.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Room-Temperature Superconductor Replicated by naasking on Thursday January 04, 2024 @03:06PM (#38871584)
Yes we do. See my edit.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Room-Temperature Superconductor Replicated by Brian_K_White on Saturday January 06, 2024 @03:08AM (#38889517)
Your edit merely shows that you are not not holding the tool of logic or reason by it's handle.

Carry on mystic wanderer.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Room-Temperature Superconductor Replicated by naasking on Saturday January 06, 2024 @11:40AM (#38892837)
An unqualified "there is X" translates to an existential quantifier in logic, eg. "there exists an X". This is basic logic translation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_translation#Problematic_...
[ Parent | on HN ]