News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What went wrong with Horizon: learning from the Post Offi... by michaelt on Thursday January 04, 2024 @11:04AM (#38868626)
One of the bizarre anachronisms I learned about from the coverage of this is that the Post Office was able to perform "private prosecutions" [1] bringing criminal proceedings without involving a public prosecutor.

The Post Office was even offering plea deals, telling sub-postmasters that if they plead guilty to false accounting they'd drop charges of theft.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_prosecution

Re:What went wrong with Horizon: learning from the Post Offi... by denton-scratch on Thursday January 04, 2024 @11:57AM (#38869340)
Until fairly recently, all prosecutions were private prosecutions; the state didn't think that prosecuting crimes was any of its business.

I once did work for the Post Office Investigations Division. I was "hired help" - I was employed by a hardware vendor. The people I was working with were pleasant, decent and clever people; but they explained to me that the organization was secretive, and operated rather like a cross between MI5 and Special Branch. That's not similar to a normal private prosecution. The UK now has a Crown Prosecution Service; the police pass a completed investigation to the CPS, and the CPS decides whether charges are justified. There are laws restricting what police investigators are allowed to do and say. None of that applies to the Post Office Investigations Division (who apparently employ their own prosecuting counsel).

I think the Wikipedia article you linked explains that the Post Office's power to investigate, charge and prosecute dates back to the 17thC. So yes, "anachronism" is right.

Re:What went wrong with Horizon: learning from the Post Offi... by razakel on Thursday January 04, 2024 @11:53AM (#38869293)
The RSPCA and TV Licensing bring the majority of private prosecutions.