Re:The Curious Case of MD5
by tneely on Wednesday January 03, 2024 @11:30PM
(#38863019)
Yeah that's fair - it doesn't need to be cryptographic. But someone back in the day decided MD5 was what they wanted and it stuck. It always raises alarms with pen testers and security scans at work, and each time we have to explain that the cryptographic security is irrelevant; it's just some unfortunate genomics standard we need to support.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.