Re:U.S. cities opt to ditch their off-street parking minimums
by Moldoteck on Thursday January 04, 2024 @03:26AM
(#38864542)
You gave an anecdotal example. I can give one too: generally medium density, mixed use, bikeble areas are much safer compared to other options, bc there are always people around, some go to work, some go to shopping, some go to drink a coffee, etc, adn ppl usually feel safer in this areas.
On the other hand, low density areas are less safe bc there's no one around to call police if something happens. It's also a health problem both phisical and mental: ppl are more isolated from other ppl, it's harder to meet other ppl, it's much harder when you are old and ppl generally move less bc they must use a car for everything instead of walking/biking to the destination. In low density areas there's also a deficit of 3'rd places to meet ppl
How do you propose she visit me without a car and available parking?
Uber would cost her more than an hour of her workday.
GP is damn right the opposition to parking is detrimental to health physical and mental as well as wealth.