Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by niutech on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @09:11PM
(#38849848)
Check out more lightweight web browsers: NetSurf, Pale Moon, K-Meleon on Goanna, Otter Browser, Ultralight, as well as terminal apps: Carbonyl, Browsh, Links (it has a graphical mode too).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by rjzzleep on Wednesday January 03, 2024 @01:06AM
(#38851249)
When you run a chromium in headless mode it doesn't make the browser any lighter. I think what the OP means is that you need to have a browser with the most important JS and CSS functionality to render modern websites, but without all the junk on top of it.
qutebrowser and nyxt would fit the bill better. to be honest I feel like nyxt is really cool, but I'm not sure if choosing a lisp was the right idea.
Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by niutech on Wednesday January 03, 2024 @05:53AM
(#38852694)
You can install Carbonyl in a VPS and use my Carbonyl Terminal (https://github.com/niutech/carbonyl-terminal) as a thin client for it.
Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by rubymamis on Wednesday January 03, 2024 @10:21AM
(#38855087)
qutebrowser binary is 424MB (on macOS, at least). Is that considered light?
Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by Mr_Minderbinder on Wednesday January 03, 2024 @06:08PM
(#38861058)
Well my (un-googled) Chromium installation takes up 254MB, and I use that as my "big/corporate" browser so I would definitely not consider that light.
Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by rjzzleep on Thursday January 04, 2024 @08:56PM
(#38874801)
qutebrowser uses a qt-webengine library in the background, which is also basically a full chromium rendering engine, where not all features are exposed to the UI. It's only light in terms of UI. Just like a headless Chromium is only light on the UI side of things.
Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by subtra3t on Wednesday January 03, 2024 @03:37AM
(#38851958)
I tried using palemoon a few years ago, but many web pages just didn't work at all. I wonder if that's changed?
Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by niutech on Wednesday January 03, 2024 @05:57AM
(#38852716)
Check out yourself, the latest release was 2 weeks ago: https://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml
Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by RF_Savage on Wednesday January 03, 2024 @03:49AM
(#38852017)
There even was elinks that used svgalib instead of X.
So one could use it on a machine that did not even have any desktop enviroment installed.
Re:Show HN: Resurrecting the Dillo browser
by niutech on Wednesday January 03, 2024 @05:54AM
(#38852701)
This was Links, not Elinks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_%28web_browser%29