Re:Images altered to trick machine vision can influence huma...
by godelski on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @07:57PM
(#38849360)
I also loved their filter
> We excluded participants if they were not engaged in the task, as assessed using randomly placed catch trials with an unambiguous answer (e.g., pairing an unperturbed dog image with a cat image and asking which image is more cat-like). If a participant failed one catch trial for Experiments 2, 3, and 5, or two catch trials for Experiment 4, the task automatically terminated and their data was not analyzed.
But I fully agree, the experiments are poorly setup and they don't even have inter-correlating analysis. It's hard to tell if a force is going on, which there very well might be.
> We excluded participants if they were not engaged in the task, as assessed using randomly placed catch trials with an unambiguous answer (e.g., pairing an unperturbed dog image with a cat image and asking which image is more cat-like). If a participant failed one catch trial for Experiments 2, 3, and 5, or two catch trials for Experiment 4, the task automatically terminated and their data was not analyzed.
But I fully agree, the experiments are poorly setup and they don't even have inter-correlating analysis. It's hard to tell if a force is going on, which there very well might be.