Re:New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)
by fmajid on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @02:22AM
(#38839053)
Sounds like a retronym for the author’s initials :-)
Re:New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)
by HakanAbbas on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @02:41AM
(#38839149)
Great detection :)
Re:New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)
by HakanAbbas on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @02:18AM
(#38839037)
I wasn't really careful when making this naming. I just tried to make it a little different. I can't say that I'm successful in nomenclature.
Re:New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)
by lifthrasiir on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @02:26AM
(#38839071)
If you need some retronym, how about "highly astute ..." or "highly apt ..."?
Re:New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)
by HakanAbbas on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @02:43AM
(#38839165)
I will evaluate them.
Re:New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)
by layer8 on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @06:56AM
(#38840706)
It uses less resources, so the resource retains higher availability?
Re:New Ultra Fast Lossless Audio Codec (HALAC)
by HakanAbbas on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @07:33AM
(#38840960)
HALAC and HALIC really consume very little memory. The process speed is high at the same rate. And they offer a reasonable compression rate. Therefore, they can be used at high level and different areas.
I've searched the web and found not a single mention of "high availability" in the context of audio codecs. In fact, the top-ranked result was this very post, which doesn't explain what the term is intended to mean.