News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Compare Google, Bing, Marginalia, Kagi, Mwmbl, and ChatGPT by someguy5281 on Sunday December 31, 2023 @10:19PM (#38829511)
> Its efficacy is also strongly dependent on understanding that it's a keyword search engine with no semantic understanding.

Good. I love keyword search.

"Semantic understanding" can be so biased and ... just shady sometimes.

Re:Compare Google, Bing, Marginalia, Kagi, Mwmbl, and ChatGPT by marginalia_nu on Monday January 01, 2024 @08:18AM (#38831592)
It's tricky though. I think a lot of people think they want raw keyword search, but what they really want is a search experience that makes intuitive sense.

If you lean too much into embeddings and so on, it's easy to get errors that don't make sense to a human being. It's extremely frustrating when you experience "I typed X, why am I getting results about Y?!"

That said, I think there's a sweet spot with some magic, where it genuinely just makes search better. But it's like perfume, if it's immediately obvious that it's there, it's probably a fair bit too much.

Re:Compare Google, Bing, Marginalia, Kagi, Mwmbl, and ChatGPT by scarface_74 on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @09:09AM (#38841712)
Keyword search leads to things like every website would put meaningless words in the meta section of their website so it would be picked by Altavista
Re:Compare Google, Bing, Marginalia, Kagi, Mwmbl, and ChatGPT by chupapimunyenyo on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @07:41PM (#38849229)
No, if it's done right. Source: I made my own search engine