Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for accounts

Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by sokoloff on Sunday December 31, 2023 @01:31PM (#38826258)

I believe there exist some set of crimes for which lifelong punishment is appropriate. Which crimes are in that set is a fine topic for debate and some may argue that the null set is correct. For me, the set is not-null.

(Simple drug possession, of any drug, in any amount, is not among that set for me.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by uxp8u61q on Sunday December 31, 2023 @04:05PM (#38827515)

Take it up with the UNHRC.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by sokoloff on Sunday December 31, 2023 @04:10PM (#38827551)

I have way better uses for my time than to argue with them in either direction.

They can hold whatever stance they do and I'll do the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by uxp8u61q on Sunday December 31, 2023 @04:29PM (#38827671)

As if the opinion of a random person on the internet had the same value as the policy of an organization established by the general assembly of the UN.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by sokoloff on Sunday December 31, 2023 @06:42PM (#38828475)

If it helps, I value your opinion, random internet commenter, on equal footing with the UN’s.

[ Parent | on HN ]