Re:Nuclear Power Gets New Push in U.S., Winning Converts (2022)
by JumpCrisscross on Friday December 29, 2023 @11:10AM
(#38806446)
> What does the evidence say?
That it’s not safety related. The evidence being in the block you quoted: it shouldn’t take 10 years to clear a wire through environmental review.
Re:Nuclear Power Gets New Push in U.S., Winning Converts (2022)
by wolverine876 on Friday December 29, 2023 @11:13AM
(#38806516)
If someone has the evidence, that would be great. Your comments seem so dismissive and determined that it's hard to take them at face value. Do you work in the industry?
Re:Nuclear Power Gets New Push in U.S., Winning Converts (2022)
by JumpCrisscross on Friday December 29, 2023 @11:27AM
(#38806730)
> someone has the evidence
For what? These threads are littered with citations and specific data.
> Do you work in the industry?
Nope.
Maybe it's safety, democracy (locals and others get a say in having a local nuclear plant) or lots of other things we could speculate. What does the evidence say? And even if permitting is involved, that could just be the mechanism of safety, democracy, etc.
Words like 'obviously' and 'bunk' (in a prior comment) aren't persuasive, just provocative - they signal to me that you won't listen to anyone else (maybe you don't mean it that way).