News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT instances. Parent comment

Re:NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT in... by superb-owl on Thursday December 28, 2023 @09:18AM (#38793686)
> A sibling comment mentions search engines. I think there's a big difference. A search engine doesn't replace the source, not at all.

Google has been accused for years of replacing sources with their "One Box"--the big answers at the top of the page, which are usually pulled from or corroborated by search results. They don't want you to leave the search results page (where the ads are).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT in... by paxys on Thursday December 28, 2023 @11:13AM (#38794910)
Google is very careful to license all the content that shows up in that interface. They even pay Wikipedia, despite legally not needing to at all.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT in... by Kim_Bruning on Thursday December 28, 2023 @02:00PM (#38797135)
While paying for CC content is not 100% anathema, it'd be pretty weird if that was what they were doing.

Instead, I think they're paying for this:

https://enterprise.wikimedia.com/

[ Parent | on HN ]