NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT instances

Re:NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT in... by Baldbvrhunter on Thursday December 28, 2023 @05:27AM (#38792018)

I would say 9 times out of 10 it's to get around the paywall and absolutely not some higher moralistic preservation of history.

And everything is a grey area, determining the line is the existential purpose of these court cases.

We've been here before with hyperlinking, then indexing and then linking with previews and the Canadian Facebook stuff but I think this has more standing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT in... by nulbyte on Thursday December 28, 2023 @06:59AM (#38792575)

If I buy a book, I get a work of literature. But if I buy a news subscription I get a series of facts riddled with advertisements. I accept the former, but I oppose the latter. I suspect I'm not the only one.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT in... by Baldbvrhunter on Thursday December 28, 2023 @07:47AM (#38792931)

I don't fully understand what you're opposing.

is it?

1) that you paid for news

2) that it included ads

both are just the price you want to pay. There are various state news outlets that you're probably already paying for - npr, pbs, bbc, cncb depending on your region

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT in... by cantSpellSober on Thursday December 28, 2023 @03:07PM (#38797969)

That's why you don't pay for news?

There are browser extensions that block ads. They are called ad blockers.

[ Parent | on HN ]